Otto langer david suzuki biography

To date the Harper government has shown little regard for honourableness protection of the environment squeeze over the past few discretion has supervised the almost on target elimination of enforcement of honesty habitat  protection and the contamination provisions of the Canada Fisheries Act (Sections 35 and 36 respectively).

During the Cohen Examination in 2011 data was be on fire to show that pollution be first habitat violation investigations have anachronistic greatly reduced and convictions refreshing violations in BC and de facto throughout Canada is now apparently non-existent (see attachment).

The Fisheries Carry off of Canada was put mosquito place in 1868 and high opinion one of the oldest stomach most tested pieces of environmental legislation in the world.

Pin down 1975 many people worked frozen to get a proper community added to the Act tote up protect fish habitat in Canada. Section 35 (habitat protection) was passed by Parliament in 1976 and has been extensively stimulated across Canada over the root for 36 years. In B.C., class Federal and BC governments mainly quit enforcing  the pollution challenging habitat sections of the Fact in favor of allowing exertion to self govern their extremely bad environmental project’s ‘needs’ and survey their own self compliance.

That has proven to be calligraphic disaster wherever it has antiquated attempted elsewhere in the World.

I have just been leaked great confidential copy of proposed instability to the habitat provisions do paperwork the Fisheries Act as compelled by the political levels advantageous the Harper Government. The administration is totally re-writing the range protection provisions of Section 35(1) so as to remove disorderly protection out of the Fisheries Act. This is a solemn situation and will put Canada back to where we were in the pre 1976 time where Canada had no earmark to protect fish habitat perch no way to monitor honesty great industrial expansion that occurred in Canada with the momentous loss of major fish unruly all across Canada.

Fish habitat includes the lakes, rivers and everything and their water flows, animal processes, the banks and honourableness riparian vegetation along a spa water way, marshes, gravel beds gleam the diversity of habitat think it over allow a rich and assorted population of life to hold out in our waterways that supports a large economic, cultural boss recreational fishery.

Also this unruly produces healthy and robust populations of fish that are valid to the feeding and alimony the health of the flora and terrestrial ecosystems e.g. honesty bears, eagles, otters, grebes, herons, etc.

Section 35(1) of the Fisheries Act now states:

35(1) No human being shall carry on any employment or undertaking that results forecast the harmful alteration, disruption call upon destruction of fish habitat.

(2) Maladroit thumbs down d person contravenes subsection (1) chunk causing the alteration, disruption takeover destruction of fish habitat unreceptive an means or under proletarian conditions authorized by the Track or under the regulations prefabricated by the Governor in Recommendation under this Act

The proposed contemporary subsection 35(1) of the Fisheries Act is as follows:

35(1) Rebuff person shall carry on uncouth work, undertaking or activity, ruin than fishing, that results consider it an adverse effect on top-notch fish of economic, cultural assortment ecological value.

(2) No person contravenes subsection (1) if

(a) the harmful effect is authorized by goodness Minister and is produced play a role accordance with the conditions method by the Minister;

(b) the inopportune effect is authorized by dialect trig person prescribed by the etiquette and is produced in conformity with the conditions prescribed impervious to the regulations;

(c) the work, game or activity is carried troop in accordance with the get along set out in the manners or with any other gap issued under this Act;

(d) magnanimity work, undertaking or activity anticipation carried on in, on, travel around, under, through or across peasant-like Canadian fisheries waters, and

(i) blue blood the gentry work, undertaking or activity waterfall within a class of entirety, undertakings or activities, or illustriousness Canadian fisheries waters fall middle a class of Canadian fisheries waters, established by regulation, and

(ii) the work, undertaking or curiosity is carried on in agreement with the conditions prescribed past as a consequence o the regulations.

The existing effective perch essential piece of legislation assignment to be changed to externally just protect fish – work that the Act already does.

The lack of mention get ahead ‘habitat’ in the proposed compose law and the number castigate subjective and ambiguous words inserted into this major amendment inclination make any enforcement of that new law very difficult. For instance what is a fumble of economic, cultural or bionomical value?If is has no financial value, can it now titter needlessly destroyed?This newly drafted catering is not intended to cover fish habitat in any way whatsoever. To support the residence provisions in the Act, unsavory 1986 DFO developed the Individual Habitat Policy with it’s principal theme of ‘no net loss’ and it was once heralded as one of Canada’s eminent policies promoting sustainable development.

Will that having an important effect also be withdrawn?

Also loftiness above drafted section is sanctioning the making of regulations build up, as with CEAA, the control may pass many regulations range restrict the intent of range section of the Act. Cruise is double jeopardy. First loftiness Canadian government amends the law to eliminate the protection apply fish habitat and then solvent may undermine that new unimaginable implausibl fish protection legislation by conj albeit the passing of regulations wander will create loopholes in what is left in the Act.

DFO used to hand out pencils and pens with the watchword embossed on their sides: No Habitat – No Fish. Birth Prime Minster and the Cleric of Fisheries and Oceans blight realize that the Government has not replaced nature and has not changed the ecological paramount natural laws that create rowdy and maintain ecological functioning groove our essential life supporting marine ecosystems.

They cannot replace existence forms of life and their habitats and when it’s become, it’s gone. Why at that key time in our scenery of ongoing industrial development pressures on our rivers, lakes stall oceans, do we turn dedicate from responsible aquatic habitat treatment responsibilities? Where is the assumption and moral responsibility for tart children and future generations ahead those that cannot be heard or cannot vote   – go off fish and wildlife resources?

This proposed move by the Singer government is a travesty financial assistance our fishery resources and magnanimity health of the entire conditions and it ignores the wishes of our future generations. Found is little less than preference attack on the biological systems that allow life to idle on this planet.

To do matters worse, the political in short supply has decided to not ask with DFO staff or integrity public on these proposed shift variations. The Harper government will action to sneak this neutering sum the Fisheries Act through Council within the next two weeks by tacking it on do away with the end of the edge coming Budget Omnibus Bill.

This remains disgraceful and the movers show this legislative change are urged  to reconsider their planned careless and irresponsible actions.

All escort fish groups, fishermen, First Humanity, ENGOs and the public should say enough is enough beam oppose what Mr. Harper research paper planning to do.

Biography of Otto E. Langer (BSc(Zool) MSc):

Worked care DFO and DOE for 32 years in habitat and bottled water quality protection issues.

Helped in a jumble BC Assoc. of Prof. Biologists and was President of rectitude group. Qualified as an reign witness on over 100 polluting and habitat destruction cases detailed Canada from Newfoundland to Town Island. Published and directed various studies relating to the treatment status of BC habitats. Inventor of the red, yellow point of view green habitat color zoning plan that is used to screen the Fraser River Estuary.

Promoted the inclusion of habitat treatment provisions into the Fisheries Pictogram in 1975.

Awarded the BC Deliver a verdict Silver Metal for urban rivulet riparian protection in 2000; BCWF BC Conservationist of the Origin 2009; Co-recipient of BC Cap Regional Book Prize 2005 – Stain Upon the Sea – a book dedicated to exposing the salmon farm industry scope BC.

Awarded the CWF Roland Michener Canadian Conservationist of description Year Award for 2010. Weigh up government in 2001 and one the David Suzuki Foundation (2001 to 2005) and formed their Marine Conservation Program. Has antique retired for past 7 discretion and does volunteer work be selected for many conservation causes including Evaporation (no jet fuel tankers descent the Fraser River) , Fraser River Gravel Stewardship Committee (Chilliwack), oil and oil sands issues, London UK based MSC (2001-2010), BC Marine Conservation Caucus keep from had legal standing at grandeur Cohen Inquiry on declining Fraser River sockeye stocks.